
Well, of course they do... but they're making a mistake in their attempts to get people to drive more sensibly - they don't react to things when they're driving! When they are driving to the scene of an emergency they call that an "emergency RESPONSE" rather than an "emergency REACTION"
The difference in the words might seem tricky to put into words. The dictionary definitions of the two words if you search on google are...
REACT- to act in response to something; to respond in a particular way
RESPOND - to do something as a reaction to somebody or something
So they are very, very similar in definition, but for me though, it's the emotion that is attached to the two words that is crucially important when used in the context of driving:
REACTING to something gives a picture of something urgent, hurried, fast, instinctive or even competitive - sportspeople react to the actions of their opponents.


RESPONDING to something feels more considered, relaxed and thought out... it's co-operative, courteous and the right thing to do having weighed up various options.
Now... when you see newly qualified, young drivers driving badly, perhaps give some thought to why they think that driving fast and relying on quick reactions are signs of good driving... 90% of the people talking to them about what "good driving" is have been telling them that's how to do it for years - we call it "unintended learning" in our profession.
Now... when you see newly qualified, young drivers driving badly, perhaps give some thought to why they think that driving fast and relying on quick reactions are signs of good driving... 90% of the people talking to them about what "good driving" is have been telling them that's how to do it for years - we call it "unintended learning" in our profession.